| 律师虚假陈述民事责任若干问题探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 董超英,罗家清.律师虚假陈述民事责任若干问题探析[J].江西教育学院学报,2006,27(1):26-29. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 董超英 罗家清 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中师范大学政法学院,湖北,武汉,430079 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 律师对其在证券市场信息披露中的虚假陈述行为应承担民事责任。律师虚假陈述行为是一种以间接契约为基础的侵权行为,不同于传统的一般的侵权行为,系一种新型的侵权行为;应适用过错推定原则认定律师是否应当承担责任,而认定过错的主要标准是其是否遵守了执业规程,有必要设立专家委员会来判断律师是否存在执业过错;再者应适用相当因果关系说来认定律师虚假陈述的民事责任,并在存在多个责任主体的情形时正确区分律师虚假陈述行为的原因力大小。
|
| 关 键 词： | 律师 虚假陈述 行为性质 归责原则 因果关系 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-3638（2006）01-0026-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-09-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月2日 |
Study on Many Problems about Civil Liability of False Stating Action of Lawyers |
| |
| DONG Chao-ying,LUO Jia-qing.Study on Many Problems about Civil Liability of False Stating Action of Lawyers[J].Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education,2006,27(1):26-29. |
| |
| Authors: | DONG Chao-ying LUO Jia-qing |
| |
| Institution: | School of Politics and Law,Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079,China |
| |
| Abstract: | If the false stating action appears in the stock market information,lawyers shall be charged with civil liabilities.The false stating action of lawyers is a kind of tort on the basis of indirect contract,a new type tort,different from the traditional tort.Cognizing whether the lawyer shall be charged with liabilities applies to causality reasoning principle.The main standard of cognizing fault is whether the lawyer abides by the engagement rules,and there is necessary to set up the committee of experts in order to judge whether the lawyer has engagement fault.Cognizing civil liabilities of the fault statement of lawyers shall apply to causality theory.And the cause power of the fault statement of lawyers should be recognized appropriately when many liability subjects exist. |
| |
| Keywords: | lawyer false stating action property reasoning principle causality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
