| 《篇海类编》真伪考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨载武.《篇海类编》真伪考[J].四川师范学院学报,2007(1):31-34. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨载武 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南大学文学院,重庆400715 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 明坊贾伪托宋濂、屠隆之名编印的《篇海类编》究竟本之何书，学术界一直未有确切结论。文章将《篇海类编》、《详校篇海》进行对比研究后，认为《篇海类编》实本之于《详校篇海》，是将《详校篇海》改头换面后重新翻刻而成的一本伪书。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《篇海类编》 《详校篇海》 伪托 伪书 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-9684（2007）01-0031-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-05-09 |
INVESTIGATION ON THE AUTHENTICITY OF PlAN HAI LEI BIAN |
| |
| YANG Zai-wu.INVESTIGATION ON THE AUTHENTICITY OF PlAN HAI LEI BIAN[J].Journal of Sichuan Teachers College (Philosophy & Social Science),2007(1):31-34. |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Zai-wu |
| |
| Abstract: | Book-sellers of the Ming dynasty pressed the book Pian Hai Lei Bian with forged names Song Lian and Tu Long. The academic world has had a long dispute about the problem what is the original resource of book. This article has a comparative s had a conclusion that Pian tudy Hai on the relation between Pian Hai Lei Bian and Xiang Jiao Pian Hai. Then we have Lei Bian was actually based on the book Xiang Jiao Pian Hai. Plan Hai Lei Bian is a false book that pirated the content of Xiang Jiao Pian Hal but just changed its form |
| |
| Keywords: | Pian Hai Lei Bian Xiang Jiao Plan Hai forge false book |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
