| 乾嘉学术的新理路:关于王学与乾嘉学术关系问题的讨论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵均强.乾嘉学术的新理路:关于王学与乾嘉学术关系问题的讨论[J].历史教学(高校版),2009(6). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵均强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学历史文化学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 当今学界有一种误区,以为王学在清初即被摒弃。余英时先生的"内在理路说"也以为乾嘉考证学是朱子道问学传统的发展。但是,实际情况并非如此。惠栋、戴震是乾嘉学术的中坚,而其学皆与王学有关,这意味着王学传统并未在乾嘉中断,在余先生所说的朱子道问学传统之外,乾嘉学术还存在着另一条王学传统的内在理路。
|
| 关 键 词： | 清代学术 王学 内在理路说 余英时 |
Wang Xue and the Textual Research during the Qianjia Era(1736-1820) |
| |
| Abstract: | It's wrong that Wang Xue was rejectod at the beginning of Qing Dynasty. Mr Yu Yingshi also regard QianJia Xue as the development of Zhuzi Xue. But, it's not the fact. As the core member of Qian Jia Xue, Hui Dong and Tai Zhen were related with Wang Xue closely. It means Wang Xue is not end in Qian Jia Era. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Academic during the Qing Dynasty Wang Xue Inner Reasonable Road Says Yu Ying Shi |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
