| 语言测试的反拨效应理论与实证研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 亓鲁霞.语言测试的反拨效应理论与实证研究[J].外语教学理论与实践,2011,1(4):23-28. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 亓鲁霞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东外语外贸大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 过去二十来年，语言测试反拨效应研究成果可观。理论研究涉及测试影响的属性、范围、层面和运行机制，还涉及其强度、长度、具体性、意图与性质，为实证研究提供了操作框架。实证研究反过来验证理论，主要发现有：反拨效应体现在教学的各个环节和层面，如教学内容、方法、教材编写等，正面负面影响兼而有之。相比之下，测试对学习效果的影响研究不多，两者之间的关系有待探明。此外，反拨效应的一些理论模型仍有欠缺，尚需完善，以增强解释力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 测试 反拨效应 涉考者 |
A review of washback studies |
| |
| Qi Luxia.A review of washback studies[J].外语教学理论与实践,2011,1(4):23-28. |
| |
| Authors: | Qi Luxia |
| |
| Abstract: | In the past two decades or so, washback or the influence of testing on teaching and learning has been intensely researched. Hypotheses and models have been formulated to uncover its nature, scope, patterns and mechanisms. Its intensity, length, specificity, intentionality and value have also been explored. Theorizing has done much to provide frameworks for empirical studies, which in turn have afforded evidence for or against concepts and theories of washback. An overview of the washback studies has shown that language tests have imposed both positive and negative washback on all aspects of teaching and learning, including teaching content, methods, materials. However, tests' influence on learning outcome remains largely nebulous due to scarcity of studies on this issue. Further, washback theories and models still leave considerable room for improvement before their explanatory power can be desirably enhanced. |
| |
| Keywords: | testing washback stakeholders |
|
| 点击此处可从《外语教学理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《外语教学理论与实践》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
