| 对鲁迅的误读与妄评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 闵抗生.对鲁迅的误读与妄评[J].淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,25(3):397-400. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 闵抗生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 淮阴师范学院,中文系,江苏,淮安,223001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对鲁迅的妄评由来已久,其中一个重要原因是对鲁迅的误读。这一状况在当前鲁迅评论与研究中仍表现得很突出。冯骥才将“国民性”与“国民劣根性”等同,而以阿0为“国民劣根性”的标本,作出了“鲁迅的国民性批判来源于西方人的东方观”的结论,把鲁迅对国民性的研究说成是一种“西方的霸权话语”,就是对“国民性”的严重的误读。思想家与一般读在思想上存在一定的距离,因而被误读、误解是会有的,作为评论应尽量避免误读。评论需调整心态,才能走近或走进鲁迅。
|
| 关 键 词： | 妄评 误读 国民性 西方人的东方观 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8444(2003)03-00%%-%% |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年10月20 |
About Misunderstanding and Absurd Criticism to LU Xun |
| |
| MIN Kang-sheng.About Misunderstanding and Absurd Criticism to LU Xun[J].Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition),2003,25(3):397-400. |
| |
| Authors: | MIN Kang-sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | As a result of misunderstanding, LU Xun has been criticized absurdly for a long time, which has become a popular situation in the comments an study to LU Xun. In FENG Ji-cai 's opinion, "national nature" equals to "national natural low quality" sampled as A Q, and he made such a conclusion that the critical comments to the 'national nature" LU Xun made from the western opinions to the eastern. It is a kind of misunderstanding seriously to LU Xun that looking LU Xun's studies for national nature as western supreme words. Now that there exist distance between ideologists and general readers, as commenters, we should avoid it. Only through adjusting psychology, commenters can truly comment on LU Xun |
| |
| Keywords: | absurd criticism misunderstand national nature the western opinions to the eastern |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
