| 论梁启超《清代学术概论》中的科学精神 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石井刚.论梁启超《清代学术概论》中的科学精神[J].内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,32(5):35-39. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石井刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 石井刚（内蒙古大学外国语学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010021） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在《清代学术概论》中,梁启超将清代思潮的变迁过程分成三个不同的阶段.而贯穿三个阶段他所予以重视的关键性精神即是“科学精神”.梁启超所关心的问题在于学问该如何得到发展,并且忧虑“致用”的主观动机容易介入研究过程,从而影响其客观性,因此,梁启超主张学者应避开去问所治的学问是否实用.“为学问而治学问”,这就是梁启超《清代学术概念》中所要表达的中心思想.梁启超深刻地体会到了政治权力主宰真理和正义的严酷现实,他所站到的非政治性立场本身就在政治社会环境中.《概论》在政治思想史学上具有深刻的意义.
|
| 关 键 词： | 梁启超 清代学术 科学精神 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年4月26日 |
On the Scientific Spirit Embodied in Liang Qichao's Book The Learning in Qing Dynasty: An Introduction |
| |
| Ishii Tsuyoshi.On the Scientific Spirit Embodied in Liang Qichao's Book The Learning in Qing Dynasty: An Introduction[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Humanities & Social Sciences),2000,32(5):35-39. |
| |
| Authors: | Ishii Tsuyoshi |
| |
| Abstract: | In The academic outline in Qing dynasty, Liang Qichao divides the evolution of the thoughts in Qing dynasty into three different phases through which he evaluates "scientism". The issue Liang Qichao concerns is how can learning be developed and he worries that the subjective motives of "practical purposes" brought into the research would affect the objectiveness of its process. Therefore, Liang Qichao advocates that a scholar should avoid the question whether what he studies is useful. "To research for research" is the main idea of this book. He profoundly recognizes the severe reality that the political power determines the fate of truth and justice. Since his non-political attitude itself is not out of the political social environment, the book is profoundly meaningful in the study of the history of political thoughts. |
| |
| Keywords: | Liang Qichao the academy in Qing dynasty scientism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
