Describing and explaining research productivity |
| |
| Authors: | Paul Ramsden |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Griffith Institute for Higher Education, Griffith University, 4111, Nathan, Australia
|
| |
| Abstract: | This article describes results from a study of academic productivity in Australian higher education. It estimates the output (in terms of quantity of publications) of individual staff and academic departments across different subject areas and types of institution. Concerning research productivity, Australian academics resemble their colleagues in other countries: the average is low, while the range of variation is high. Most papers are produced by few academic staff. Several potential correlates of productivity, including level of research activity, subject area, institutional type, gender, age, early interest in research, and satisfaction with the promotions system, are examined. A model linking departmental context to personal research performance through department and personal research activity is developed and tested. The results support the view that structural factors (such as how academic departments are managed and led) combine with personal variables (such as intrinsic interest in the subject matter of one's discipline) to determine levels of productivity. There is also evidence that research and teaching do not form a single dimension of academic performance. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
