| 创新研究群体项目的绩效评价及其对科技评价的启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高 杰,苏 竣,谢其军.创新研究群体项目的绩效评价及其对科技评价的启示[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(10):87-91. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高 杰 苏 竣 谢其军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | ISTIC-Taylor&Francis Group学术前沿观察联合实验室,北京 100038;清华大学公共管理学院,北京 100084;清华大学科教政策研究中心,北京100084;清华大学公共管理学院,北京 100084;清华大学科教政策研究中心,北京100084 |
| |
| 基金项目： | ISTIC-Taylor & Francis Group学术前沿观察联合实验室开放基金项目“规模与演化视角下中国创新研究群体的团队合作质量与演化规律研究”（IT1902）；国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“规模视角下中国创新研究群体的团队合作与创新质量研究”（71904101）；国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目“中国公共政策理论与治理机制研究”（71721002） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 将我国国家自然科学基金资助体系中的创新研究群体项目绩效评价工作分为评价筹备、函评会评和绩效评价报告撰写修订发布阶段,以2015年度创新研究群体项目绩效评价为例,梳理分析其工作流程和具体实施情况等相关工作内容.创新研究群体项目具有前沿探索与人才培养双重属性,同时还具有资助力度大、周期长以及考核宽松等特点,相关绩效评价工作结合该类项目特性,基于同行评议和评价指标体系(包括抽查项目与总体项目评价)设计,取得以《国家自然科学基金2015年度绩效报告》为精简版主报告在内的3份研究报告.研究结果提示开展科技项目评价要注重项目的 特质与要求,根据国家发展相关战略部署和要求不断改革、规范与优化流程管理,并注重开展同行评议,不断拓展科技评价的范式与边界,以促进科研项目科学合理与平稳有序发展,并促进提升我国科技评价工作水平.
|
| 关 键 词： | 创新研究群体 创新研究群体项目 科技评价 项目绩效评价 同行评议 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020/10/1 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2021/5/11 0:00:00 |
Performance Evaluation of Creative Research Group Project and Its Enlightenment to Science and Technology Evaluation |
| |
| Gao Jie,Su Jun,Xie Qijun.Performance Evaluation of Creative Research Group Project and Its Enlightenment to Science and Technology Evaluation[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2021,41(10):87-91. |
| |
| Authors: | Gao Jie Su Jun Xie Qijun |
| |
| Abstract: | The performance evaluation of creative research group project in National Natural Science Foundation of China funding system is divided into evaluation preparation stage, letter evaluation and meeting evaluation stage, and the stage of performance evaluation report writing, revision and release. Taking the performance evaluation of creative research group project in 2015 as an example, its workflow and specific implementation are analyzed. The creative research group project has the dual attributes of frontier exploration and talent training, as well as the characteristics of large funding, long cycle and loose assessment. The relevant performance evaluation work is designed based on the characteristics of the project, peer review and evaluation index system (including spot check project and overall project evaluation). Three research reports including the 2015 annual performance report of National Natural Science Foundation of China were obtained, and the evaluation work was successfully completed. The performance evaluation of creative research group project suggests that the evaluation of science and technology projects should pay attention to the characteristics and requirements of scientific research projects, constantly reform, standardize and optimize the project process management according to the national development strategy and requirements, pay attention to peer review, and constantly expand the paradigm and boundary of science and technology evaluation, so as to promote the scientific, reasonable, stable and orderly development of scientific research projects, and promote the level of science and technology evaluation in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | Creative Research Group science and technology evaluation performance evaluation peer review |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
