| 质性研究中的多重研究关系和伦理“雷区”：一位行动研究者的自反性思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王熙.质性研究中的多重研究关系和伦理“雷区”：一位行动研究者的自反性思考[J].学科教育,2009(4):69-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王熙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学社会学系,北京100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为质性研究发展的新趋向，行动研究所提倡的“合作”、“反思”、“变革”等理念越来越多地渗入至当代的民族志研究中。例如，批判民族志（Critical Ethnography）结合了批判理论和建构主义的认识论，认为研究者不应局限于客观地观察和记录被研究者的生活，还应充分反思自己在建构知识的过程中所扮演的角色，并充分“赋权”被研究者。基于平等的对话，被研究者才能够成为思考和行动的主体；研究所获得的知识才能在最大程度上摆脱意识形态的扭曲。在这篇论文中，作者主要回顾自己在一项突出行动性的民族志研究中的经验。通过反身性思考，本文揭示了研究关系的多重性、复杂性和敏感性，尤其是跨越“虚拟”与“真实”的伦理“雷区”。文章主要探讨两大问题：第一，在具体的社会情境中，研究关系是如何逐步建立起来的？第二，整个研究过程遭遇了哪些伦理危机？最佳解决途径是什么？作者对这些问题的讨论为今后的行动研究提供了一些与社会情境紧密相联的“经验性智慧”。这些经验可以帮助行动研究逐渐适应我国的具体国情，真正调动其广大一线教师的参与积极性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 质性研究 行动研究 研究关系 所有研究参与者 伦理“雷区” |
The Multi-layered Relationship and the Ethical Minefield in Qualitative Inquiries： An Action Researcher＇s Reflection |
| |
| WANG Xi.The Multi-layered Relationship and the Ethical Minefield in Qualitative Inquiries： An Action Researcher＇s Reflection[J].Journal of Subject Education,2009(4):69-76. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Xi |
| |
| Institution: | WANG Xi (Department of Sociology, Peking University, Beijing 100871,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | As the new trend of qualitative inquiries, action research advocates values such as ＂collaboration＂, ＂reflexivity＂ and ＂transformation＂, which have penetrated into the contemporary ethnographic study. For instance, the Critical Ethnography, combining the epistemology of critical theory and constructionist epistemology, holds that the researchers should not confine themselves to the objective observation and recording the life of the participants; they should also make reflection on the role he plays in the course of constructing knowledge and fully ＂empower＂ the participants. Only by equal conversation, can participants become initiative in thinking and action and the knowledge gained from the research least likely to be twisted by the ideology. In this article, by reviewing the experience in an ethnographic study which emphasized action, the author makes a reflection and reveals the multi-layered, complicated and sensitive relationship in the research and the ethical ＂minefield＂ between ＂virtual＂ and ＂real＂. The article discusses two questions： firstly, how were social relations established in the specific social context; secondly, what kind of ethical issues did the author encounter while conducting research and what was the best solution？ The author＇s experience may be useful to other researchers engaged in action research and helpful in making action research gradually fit in the specific situation in China, and motivate the school teachers in a real sense. |
| |
| Keywords: | qualitative inquires action research relationships in research all participants ethical ＂minefield＂ |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
