| “九一八”事变前后关于东北历史归属之争 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 田海林,方艳华.“九一八”事变前后关于东北历史归属之争[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008,31(6):122-125. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 田海林 方艳华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东师范大学,历史文化与社会发展学院,山东,济南,250014
2. 北京师范大学,历史学院,北京,100875 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “九一八”事变前后,日伪公然歪曲历史,提出东北是“独立国”的谬论。妄图以此为伪满的成立寻找历史依据,也为日本占领东北披上合法的外衣。对此,中国史学界广大仁人志士据理力争,除了揭示日伪反动言论的本质外,他们还按诸典籍,以历史文化为主要武器,并结合地理、法律等知识,论断和确认了东北是中国的神圣领土,从而有力地驳斥了日伪的反动谬论。
|
| 关 键 词： | “九一八”事变 东北 历史归属 |
The Dispute about Historical Belongingness of the Northeast of China before and after the Breakout of "the September 18th" Incident |
| |
| TIAN Hai-lin,FANG Yan-hua.The Dispute about Historical Belongingness of the Northeast of China before and after the Breakout of "the September 18th" Incident[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition),2008,31(6):122-125. |
| |
| Authors: | TIAN Hai-lin FANG Yan-hua |
| |
| Institution: | TIAN Hai-lin1,FANG Yan-hua2 |
| |
| Abstract: | Before and after the breakout of the September 18th Incident,Japanese invaders and the Puppet government distorted history openly saying that Northeast of China was an "independent country" in order to search the historical basis for the establishment of Manchuria Puppet Government and Japanese occupation.Contrarily,Chinese history scholars used historical culture as the main weapons,combined with the geographical and legal knowledge to reveal the reactionary nature of remarks of Japanese and Puppets government and confirmed that Northeast China is the holy territory of China,which refuted the enemy's fallacy effectively. |
| |
| Keywords: | "the September 18th" Incident Northeast of China historical belongingness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
