Evaluating student perceptions of learning processes and intended learning outcomes under inquiry approaches |
| |
| Authors: | Rachel Spronken-Smith Rebecca Walker Julie Batchelor Billy O’Steen Tom Angelo |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Higher Education Development Centre , University of Otago , Dunedin, New Zealand;2. Library, Learning and Information Services , Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology , Christchurch, New Zealand;3. University Centre for Teaching and Learning , University of Canterbury , Christchurch, New Zealand;4. University Teaching Development Centre , Victoria University of Wellington , Wellington, New Zealand |
| |
| Abstract: | Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is promoted as a teaching approach that can enhance student learning outcomes. IBL can be categorised according to scale (e.g. tasks, course/module/paper, degree), mode (structured, guided, open) and framing (information or discovery-oriented). Our research used a survey instrument to determine how student perceptions of learning processes and intended learning outcomes (ILOs) varied in response to courses with different modes and framing of IBL. The survey was completed by 940 students in 15 IBL courses across a range of disciplines and levels. All types of IBL courses were well rated by students for encouraging learning processes and ILOs congruent with a well-designed inquiry experience. Regarding modes of IBL, there was a clear hierarchy from open (most highly rated) to guided and then structured inquiry. For the framing of IBL, courses using discovery-oriented IBL were more highly rated than information-oriented IBL. Overall, the most highly rated course design was open, discovery-oriented IBL, but other types of IBL remained important in terms of developing research and inquiry skills. To determine whether all types of IBL courses are promoting enhanced ILOs compared to more traditionally taught courses, a comparative study should be undertaken. |
| |
| Keywords: | inquiry-based learning evaluation assessment intended learning outcomes undergraduate research |
|
|
