| 唯心主义哲学与唯物主义美学及其本体论的历史错位 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄杨.唯心主义哲学与唯物主义美学及其本体论的历史错位[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(4):59-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄杨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中共南通市委党校,江苏南通226007 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 哲学家在探讨本原论问题时,从一开始就与美学本体论问题纠结在一起.西方哲学与美学本体论的错位经历了古代的历史遮蔽与混淆、近代的历史游离与困惑、现代的历史反思与还原三个时期.历史上唯物主义与唯心主义的错位就在于唯心主义哲学对唯物主义美学的遮蔽,在于将美学的感性存在第一性误解为哲学的物质存在第一性.“思维与存在的关系问题”是哲学基本问题与美学基本问题及其本体论的交错;审美的“感性存在”就是哲学的唯物存在;美学的“唯心主义”（精神实体）就是哲学的“唯物主义”（感性存在）.极端的唯名论属于美学范畴,极端的唯实论属于哲学范畴,而温和的唯名论与温和的唯实论及其调和论使得哲学与美学进一步混淆.在整个西方哲学史和美学史的复式历程中,哲学学科在研究辩证思维规律而在美学的对象中为自己寻找丰富的材料时,或美学在考查原始经验而把思想和意识带回到它们的起源上去时,往往越俎代庖——成为“哲学帝国主义”或“美学帝国主义”,从而造成了唯心主义哲学与唯物主义美学的历史错位.
|
| 关 键 词： | 唯心主义哲学 唯物主义美学 美学本体论 |
Historic Dislocation of Idealism Philosophy and Materialism Aesthetics in Their Ontology |
| |
| HUANG Yang.Historic Dislocation of Idealism Philosophy and Materialism Aesthetics in Their Ontology[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Humanities & Social Science),2013(4):59-66. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Yang |
| |
| Institution: | HUANG Yang (Party School of Nantong Municipal Committee of CPC, Nantong, 226007, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | When the ＂being＂ of the world was probed by philosophers, it was mixed up with the ontology of aesthetics at the very beginning. The dislocation of the ontology of philosophy and aesthetics experienced three stages ： shade and garble in ancient times, dissociation and confusion in modern times, self-examination and restitution in the contemporary. In the dual process of the western philosophy and aesthetics, materialism aesthetics was shaded by idealism philosophy, as well as the primary of aesthetic perceptual being was misunderstood by the primary of philosophical material being, so that philoso- phy and aesthetics went beyond their duties to become ＂philosophy imperialism＂ or ＂aesthetics imperialism＂. That＇s why there is a dislocation between idealism philosophy and materialism aesthetics. |
| |
| Keywords: | idealism philosophy materialism aesthetics Aesthetic ontology |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
