| 体育研究中定量综合评价方法的比较与实证研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵书祥.体育研究中定量综合评价方法的比较与实证研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2008,31(11). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵书祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京体育大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 利用中国老年人体质调研组数据库中部分老年男性数据计算出德尔菲法、层次分析法、主成分分析法、复相关系数法和等权法五种权重并相应确定了五种定量综合评价函数,给出了定量综合评价方法比较的原则与方法并进行了五种综合评价结果的比较。研究表明对老年男性的体质进行综合评价时,等权法最好,最能体现全面、均衡发展的原则。
|
| 关 键 词： | 综合评价 权重 指标一致化方法 |
The Comparison of Quantitative Comprehensive-Evaluation Methods and Empirical Research in Sport Science |
| |
| ZHAO Shu-xiang.The Comparison of Quantitative Comprehensive-Evaluation Methods and Empirical Research in Sport Science[J].Journal of Beijing Sport University,2008,31(11). |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Shu-xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | Calculated the Delphi method,the AHP method,principal component analysis method,correlation coefficient method and equal rights method of the five weights and given the corresponding five quantitative comprehensive-evaluation function by the China's elderly physique research group in the database part of elderly men data,Given the quantitative comparison principles of the comprehensive-evaluation methods and methods of the five comprehensive evaluation of the results of the comparison.The research shows that equal rights method is the best and it fully embodies the principle of comprehensive and balanced development when make comprehensive Evaluation of elderly male physique. |
| |
| Keywords: | comprehensive evaluation weight indicators consistency method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
