| 略论我国反垄断私人执行体制的建构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱文鑫.略论我国反垄断私人执行体制的建构[J].安顺师范高等专科学校学报,2010,12(3):69-71. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱文鑫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学法学院,江苏,南京210046 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 私人执行体制的缺少,导致《反垄断法》不能很好地被执行,实现不了其预期的价值。建构私人执行体制有相当的迫切性和可行性。合理的私人执行模式应当有＂宽泛的私人执行的主体资格＂、＂三倍以内惩罚性损害赔偿制度＂、＂人数不特定的代表人诉讼制度＂、＂主要由垄断方承担诉讼费制度＂、＂仲裁解决垄断法律争议＂五个方面。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反垄断执行体制 私人执行 |
Chinese Anti-monopoly System,the Construction of Private Enforcement |
| |
| Zhu Wenxin.Chinese Anti-monopoly System,the Construction of Private Enforcement[J].Journal of Anshun Teachers College,2010,12(3):69-71. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhu Wenxin |
| |
| Institution: | Zhu Wenxin (School of Law Nanjing University, Najing 210046 ,Jiangshu, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The lack of private enforcement system, resulting in ＂anti-monopoly law＂ can not be executed well, so it＇s not achieve its expected value. Construction of private enforcement system has considerable urgency and feasibility. Private enforcement should be a reasonable model of＂broad qualification of private enforcement＂, ＂three times within the system of punitive damages＂ ,＂not a specific number of representative action system＂ ,＂mainly borne by the monopoly of legal fees system＂ and＂monopoly of legal disputes to arbitration. ＂ |
| |
| Keywords: | the Anti-monopoly system |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
