| Abstract: | Archetypal psychology suggests the possibility of a punishment archetype representing the unconscious preferences of human
beings as a species about what constitutes appropriate ways for leaders (students, teachers and educational leaders) to correct
followers who do harm to others. Mythological analysis compared God’s process of punishment, in the Abraham myth, with the
theories of Scheler (1973), Kierkegaard (1987) and modern management theory about punishment. While modern theory focused
on a contingent tit-for-tat relationship between doing harm and reprisal for it, God used punishment and forgiveness to reestablish
effective moral relationships between the harm-doer and the harmed persons. God always forgave harm done to himself, and generally
punished harm done to others but then forgave unilaterally, without waiting for Abraham to improve. If students and educators
are unconsciously predisposed to expect that punishment is a long term educational activity intended to allow the harm-doer
to atone, repent and re-establish effective working relationships with harmed persons, then the focus of modern punishment
theory on intimidation will be ineffective and generate unconscious resistance. |
