Jointly valuing journal visibility and author citation count: An axiomatic approach |
| |
| Institution: | 1. International Joint Informatics Laboratory (IJIL), Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China;2. International Joint Informatics Laboratory (IJIL), University of Illinois, Champaign, United States;3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China;1. Department of Information Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China;2. Department of Network and New Media, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China;1. Library, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China;1. Laboratory for Studies of Research and Technology Transfer, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI-CNR), National Research Council of Italy, Viale Manzoni 30, 00185 Rome, Italy;2. Department of Engineering and Management, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy;1. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya, 20, 101000 Moscow, Russia;2. Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics, Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;3. University of Primorska, Andrej Maru?i? Institute, 6000 Koper, Slovenia;1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Roorkee, India;2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Gandhinagar, India;3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Kharagpur, India;4. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bombay, India |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper proposes a simple, flexible, axiom-based mechanism for facilitating the comparison between a scholar's citation count and the visibility of the journals wherein the scholar's articles were published. The goal is to help research review bodies easily grasp the distinction these two forms of scholarly accomplishment and to provide a transparent way to articulate expectations about them to scholars. The approach is demonstrated using a widely applied and cooperative functional form that can reflect, via different parameter values, a wide range of possible beliefs about the relative merits of citation counts and journal visibility. |
| |
| Keywords: | Journal prestige Scholar ranking Citations Journal visibility |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
