| 文本田野中的墨家逻辑“名”范畴意义分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾昭式.文本田野中的墨家逻辑“名”范畴意义分析[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,44(3):68-72. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾昭式 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学哲学系,广州,510275 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目，教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《墨辩》逻辑是围绕“名”问题展开研究的,它是墨家论辩的基础.如果说《小取》是墨家逻辑总纲的话,那么《小取》的逻辑体系无不涉及“名实”关系,而《经上》、《经说上》、《经下》、《经说下》、《大取》则是对名实关系的全面论述.这种“名”不同于西方传统逻辑的“词项”(概念)理论.
|
| 关 键 词： | 墨辩 西方传统逻辑 "名" |
A Semantic Analysis of the Category of Ming in Mobian |
| |
| ZENG Zhao-shi.A Semantic Analysis of the Category of Ming in Mobian[J].Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2012,44(3):68-72. |
| |
| Authors: | ZENG Zhao-shi |
| |
| Institution: | ZENG Zhao-shi (Institute of Logic and Cognition,Department of Philosophy,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The logical studies in Mobian are centered on the issue of Ming,and have laid the groundwork for the Mohist theory of argumentation.If the chapter of Xiaoqu could be regarded as the outline of the Mohist logic,then we could find within this chapter a detailed discussion of the relation between Ming and Shi.And when taking together the chapters of Jingshang,Jingshuoshang,Jingxia,Jingshuoxia,and Daqu,a comprehensive theory of Ming and Shi is well established.However,it can be demonstrated that the category of Ming itself is essentially different from the category of "term"(concept) in traditional Western logic. |
| |
| Keywords: | Mobian traditional Western logic Ming |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
