首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

质疑"学校监护"
引用本文:刘兴树.质疑"学校监护"[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2002,1(1):103-106.
作者姓名:刘兴树
作者单位:湖南师范大学法学院,湖南,长沙,410081
摘    要:关于“学校监护责任”问题存在许多模糊认识。对未成年学生在学校发生的伤害事故,许多人认为学校应无条件赔偿损失,承担无过错责任即监护责任。学生在校是其监护人适时适当的一种“监护脱手”,是一种特殊的监护形式,不构成监护关系转移给了学校。学校不是未成年学生的“委托监护人”,只有在有过错的前提下对事故承担适当的赔偿责任,而判断学校过错不能随意化。建议制订《学校法》以弥补教育法、民法监护制度的不足。

关 键 词:未成年学生  监护人  “学校监护”  过错责任  监护责任
文章编号:1671-6124(2002)01-0103-04
修稿时间:2002年1月8日

Discrediting "School guardianship"
Xing-shu LIU.Discrediting "School guardianship"[J].Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University,2002,1(1):103-106.
Authors:Xing-shu LIU
Abstract:Many vague opinions surround the problem of school guardian responsibility. A lot of people believe that schools should take the unfault responsibility i. e. that of guardianship for the accident injury at school of a underage student and compensate unconditionally him/her for the damage. When a underage student is at school, a special form of guardianship occurs which may be called the inevitable "break - away of guardianship" from the legal guardian(s), and by which is not meant any transference of guardianship to the school. A school, not as the authorized guardian of underage students, takes its proper responsibility for damages only in condition that it has fault. Arbitrariness should not be permitted in the judgement and evaluation of schools' fault. It is urged to lay down the school law to make up the defection on guardianship in the education law and the civil law.
Keywords:underage student  guardian  school guardianship  fault responsibility
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号