| “文学自觉说”的争论及其理论困惑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 田瑞文.“文学自觉说”的争论及其理论困惑[J].黔南民族师范学院学报,2011,31(2):14-19,83. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 田瑞文 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 平顶山学院文学院,河南平顶山,467000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 二十世纪中国古代文学学科建构的一个核心问题是纯文学理论的引入,鲁迅的＂文学自觉说＂正是在这个背景下出现和被接受的,但纯文学的理论逻辑和中国传统文学的发展并不完全相符,致使在讨论这个问题时研究者不得不或明或暗地强调＂文学自觉＂中＂文学＂的概念,而对＂文学＂理解的多样性使得＂文学自觉＂的研究结论各不相同。＂文学自觉说＂研究的误区在于混淆了文学史意义上＂文学＂和文学研究意义上的＂文学＂,以至于在＂文学自觉＂的问题上学界长期以来没能形成一个统一的认识,这在客观上制约了中国古代文学研究的健康发展。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文学自觉 纯文学 文学研究 文学史研究 写作模式 |
On the Argument and the Theoretic Confusion in "Self-Awakening of Literature" |
| |
| TIAN Ruiwen.On the Argument and the Theoretic Confusion in "Self-Awakening of Literature"[J].Journal of Qiannan Normal College of Nationalities,2011,31(2):14-19,83. |
| |
| Authors: | TIAN Ruiwen |
| |
| Institution: | TIAN Ruiwen(School of Liberal Arts,Pingdingshan University,Pingdingshan 467000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Pure Literature's being brought in is a core issue concerning the construction of the subject Chinese ancient literature in 20the century,based on which Self-Awakening of Literature was put forward by Luxun.The theoretic logic of pure literature,however,does not fully accord with the development of Chinese traditional literature so that the researchers have to somhow attach importance to the concept of Literature.Different comprehensions about Literature lead to various research conclusions.The misleading f... |
| |
| Keywords: | self-awakening of literature pure literature literary research literary history research writing pattern |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
