| Thomas语用失误“二分法”质疑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘绍忠,钟国仕.Thomas语用失误“二分法”质疑[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,39(4):47-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘绍忠 钟国仕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西师范大学,外国语学院,广西,桂林,541004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | Thomas的语用失误“二分法”有优点，也有缺点。语用语言失误和社交语用失误具有较强的解释力，但它们无法解释某些失误现象。有必要改进Thomas的语用失误分类理论，以便增强它的解释力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 语用失误 二分法 语用语言失误 社交语用失误 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-6597(2003)04-0047-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年4月10日 |
THOMAS' DICHOTOMOUS CLASSIFICATION OF PRAGMATIC FAILURE REVISITED |
| |
| LIU Shao zhong,ZHONG Guo shi.THOMAS'''' DICHOTOMOUS CLASSIFICATION OF PRAGMATIC FAILURE REVISITED[J].Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosphy and Social Science Edition),2003,39(4):47-50. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Shao zhong ZHONG Guo shi |
| |
| Abstract: | Analyzed the merits and demerits in Thomas' dichotomous approach to pragmatic failure. While arguing that both pragmalinguistic failure and sociopragmatic failure may account for the learners' pragmatic failures, the authors also came up with exceptions which seem unaccountable in Thomas' framework. Accordingly, it was contended that Thomas' dichotomous approach be improved to sustain its explanatory adequacy. |
| |
| Keywords: | pragmatic failure Thomas' dichotomous approach pragmalinguistic failure sociopragmatic failure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
