| 东汉初“立《左氏春秋》博士与否”牵涉出的《史记》争论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李剑清.东汉初“立《左氏春秋》博士与否”牵涉出的《史记》争论[J].渭南师范学院学报,2010,25(3):18-20. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李剑清 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宝鸡文理学院,中文系,陕西,宝鸡,721013 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 东汉初年,由＂立《左氏春秋》博士与否＂问题引发了关于《史记》的学术争议：赞成立《左氏春秋》博士者,认为《史记》多引《左氏》,应立《左传》博士。反对者指责《史记》思想原则——＂太史公违戾《五经》,谬孔子言＂,成为汉代思想界的公共话语。而汉光武帝刘秀采取理性的态度,为这场政治文化的大争论营造了学术生态。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《左氏春秋》 博士 《史记》思想原则 学术文化生态 |
Argument in Historical Records Involving the Question "Granting Tso Spring and Autumn Annals as Court Academicians or Not" in Early Eastern Han Dynasty |
| |
| LI Jian-qing.Argument in Historical Records Involving the Question "Granting Tso Spring and Autumn Annals as Court Academicians or Not" in Early Eastern Han Dynasty[J].Journal of Weinan Teachers College,2010,25(3):18-20. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jian-qing |
| |
| Institution: | LI Jian-qing (Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Baoji University of Arts and Sciences,Baoji 721013,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In early Eastern Han Dynasty,the question ＂Whether or not grant Tso Spring and Autumn Annals court academicians＂ initiated the academic argument in Historical Records.Those who support granting Tso Spring and Autumn Annals Court Academicians thought Historical Records quoted a lot from Tso Spring and Autumn Annals,so it is appropriate to grant it the honor,while those who opposed it criticized the principles in Historical Records——＂Those great Chinese historians disregarded the Five Classics and falsified the Confucius words＂,which became the public remarks in the ideological field in Han Dynasty.Liu Hsiu,the founder of the Eastern Han Dynasty,adopted a rational attitude and created a academic ecology for the big political and cultural debate. |
| |
| Keywords: | Tso Spring and Autumn Annals court academician Ideological Principles in Historical Records academic cultural ecology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
