| 《金瓶梅》毒书说、诬陷仇人与佛经故事 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王立.《金瓶梅》毒书说、诬陷仇人与佛经故事[J].徐州教育学院学报,2003,18(1):28-30. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王立 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 辽宁师范大学中文系,辽宁大连116029 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 有关《金瓶标》毒书复仇说的产生并非偶然。在对待“投毒”这一复仇方式由误读、接受到客受、认同的观念演进过程中,表现出华夏中土伦理性支配力的逐渐弱化,对于功利性——复仇目标实现的关注渐趋强化。毒药复仇与诬陷复仇,这一复仇方式与复仇本身的某种质性及其相关的化观念是相符的。《金瓶梅》的接受以及相关续书的生成流传过程中,陆续变化增殖的复仇现念介入其中,不仅为小说结撰情节发挥作用,也通过相关描写为古代复仇化观念及其在叙事学中的丰富表现,起到了巨大的审美效应。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《金瓶梅》 毒书说 复仇文化 佛经故事 复仇方式 叙事文学 审美效应 小说 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6625(2003)01-0028-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年11月20 |
View of "a Poisonous Book" on Jin Ping Mei, Frame One's Personal Enemy and Sutra Stories |
| |
| WANG Li.View of "a Poisonous Book" on Jin Ping Mei, Frame One's Personal Enemy and Sutra Stories[J].Journal of Xuzhou Education College,2003,18(1):28-30. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Li |
| |
| Abstract: | It is not a casual matter that the view of "a poisonous book" on Jin Ping Mei appears. Views on the way of poisonous revenge experienced a misunderstanding, accepting, tolerating and identifying period, which demonstrated a lowering ethical supporting power of china and an upping attention on the revenge object-utility. Poisonous revenge and framing one's personal enemy to revenge accord with some character of avengers and some correlative cultural opinions. During the acceptance of Jin Ping Mei and creating and coming down of its correlative continuous novels, continuous changing and revenge ideas are added, which plays a role not only in adapting novels ,but also adding a lot of aesthetic power into ancient revenge cultural ideas and representing in narrative literature colorfully by some rendering. |
| |
| Keywords: | Jin Ping Mei Revenge culture Motif Way of revenge Sutra stories |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
