首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

共益权与自益权的主体偏离刍论
引用本文:刘惠明,安珏.共益权与自益权的主体偏离刍论[J].山西财经大学学报(高等教育版),2014(2):91-94.
作者姓名:刘惠明  安珏
作者单位:河海大学法学院,江苏南京210098
摘    要:随着融资融券、表决权信托、种类股等业务的兴起,同一个股东所持股权中的共益权和自益权开始分别属于不同主体,即共益权和自益权的主体发生了偏离.我国公司法允许的共益权与自益权主体偏离形式有表决权的章程另行规定、红利分配的另行约定、特别股、基准日后的股份受让;以合同方式引起的共益权与自益权的主体偏离形式有融券、表决权信托、表决权拘束协议等业务.以合同方式进行的共益权与自益权主体偏离一般是有效的,有其存在的必要性,但也有其弊端,应综合公司法、市场规制法、行业规范来解决.

关 键 词:共益权  自益权  主体偏离

Subject Divergence Theory of Co-benefit Rights and Self-interest Rights
LIU Hui-ming,AN Jue.Subject Divergence Theory of Co-benefit Rights and Self-interest Rights[J].Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,2014(2):91-94.
Authors:LIU Hui-ming  AN Jue
Institution:(Law School, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)
Abstract:With the rising of securities margin, the voting trust and species shares, co-benefit rights and self-interest rights which used to belong to the same stockholder's equity start to belong to different stockholders, result in the phenomenon of divergence of co-benefit rights and self-interest rights. The subject divergence of co-benefit rights and self-interest rights that based on the contract is effective, and has the necessity of its existence. But it still has disadvantages, which should be solved by the company law, market regulation law and codes of practice comprehensively.
Keywords:co-benefit rights  self-interest rights  subject divergence
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号