| 我国新公司法中股东解散公司请求的法律问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗海盛.我国新公司法中股东解散公司请求的法律问题[J].青海师专学报,2008,28(3):56-59. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗海盛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 许昌学院法政学院,河南许昌461000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2005年新修订的公司法第183条规定了股东可以提起解散公司之诉的司法解散,为股东提供了一种新的救济途径,也为法官审判提供了法律依据.在尊重公司自治、防止股东机会主义以及司法适当干预方面,立法做了许多努力.但与发达国家公司法相比,仍存在需要考究的部分,如法院解散裁判问题、恶意诉讼问题以及诉讼担保和公司维持经营问题.
|
| 关 键 词： | 替代方法 恶意诉讼 股东公司 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-0117(2008)03-0056-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年12月10 |
Problems on Article 183 of Newly Amended Company Law of China |
| |
| LUO Hai-sheng.Problems on Article 183 of Newly Amended Company Law of China[J].Journal of Qinghai Junior Teachers' College,2008,28(3):56-59. |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Hai-sheng |
| |
| Institution: | LUO Hai-sheng (School of Law , Politics,Xuchang University,Xuchang Henan 461000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Judicial dissolution of company is at once a new relief for the shareholders and a legal excuse for courts to make decisions.Many efforts have been made on respecting corporate autonomy,preventing evil litigations and involving the cases properly.However,comparing with that of developed countries,we still have much to do,such as the verdicts of dissolution of company,evil litigations and the preserving of company.Therefore,we must try to find any substitute recovery means to save the company,do our best to ... |
| |
| Keywords: | the substitute recovery means evil litigaion the dissolution of company |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
