| 中英高等教育评估项目比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘毳.中英高等教育评估项目比较[J].高教发展与评估,2011(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘毳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学教育研究院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 英国高等学校科研评估(RAE)与中国一级学科整体水平评估(CDR)同为评估项目,均以学科为评估对象,针对高校的科研质量进行评估。但这两种评估活动在实施主体、指标体系、运行程序等方面均有很大差异。英国的高等教育质量评估工作在国际上享有盛誉,将其与我国的学科评估进行对比,探寻差异,可以为我国高等教育学科评估工作的完善提供借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学科评估 高等教育 质量保障 |
Comparison between RAE in UK and CDR in China |
| |
| Liu Cui.Comparison between RAE in UK and CDR in China[J].higher education development and evaluation,2011(5). |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Cui |
| |
| Abstract: | There is an evaluation program called Research Assessment Exercise(RAE) in UK while there is one called China Discipline Ranking(CDR) in China's mainland.The two programs both take disciplines as their object,and aim to evaluate the scientific research quality.However,there are some great differences in subject,index,and procedure,etc.RAE enjoys a high reputation in the world.This paper compares the two evaluation programs,attempts to find the differences,and thus makes references for discipline assessment ... |
| |
| Keywords: | discipline assessment higher education quality assurance |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
