| 当今中国现当代文学研究的四种理路及其评析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黎保荣.当今中国现当代文学研究的四种理路及其评析[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2007(1):152-157. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黎保荣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 暨南大学,中文系,广东,广州,510632 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文从方法论角度,从中国现当代文学研究的众多学术理路中提炼出重史料、重理论、重概念提炼与重体验感悟四种理路,在评价各种理路的优点及可行性的同时,指出它们各自的不足:“史料”的似真性,“理论”的过程性、预设性,“概念”的本质化、主观化以及“体验感悟”的欠缺严谨。文章旨在呼吁各理路的借鉴融合以及学术上的宽容开放态度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 现当代文学研究 理路 评价 |
| 文章编号： | 24225757 |
| 修稿时间： | 12 4 2006 12:00AM |
Four Logics of Research on Contemporary Chinese Literature and Relative Analysis |
| |
| Li Baorong.Four Logics of Research on Contemporary Chinese Literature and Relative Analysis[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2007(1):152-157. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Baorong |
| |
| Abstract: | By the angle of methodology,the author extracted four logics from many logics in the Chinese contemporary literary research: to give priority to the historical material,to give priority to the theory,to give priority to the conception refining,to give priority to the experience and impression.When judging their advantages and credibility,the author pointed out their shortcomings: material was plausible,theory was transitional and predictive,conception was essential and subjective,experience and impression was lack of scrupulousness.The purpose of this article was to ask four logics to use others for reference and to appeal for a tolerant and uninhibited attitude in the study. |
| |
| Keywords: | research on contemporary Chinese literature logic judge |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
