首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中美高校自主招生制度比较研究——以哈佛大学和复旦大学为例
引用本文:孟令国,张继平.中美高校自主招生制度比较研究——以哈佛大学和复旦大学为例[J].扬州大学学报(高教研究版),2011,15(2):21-24,37.
作者姓名:孟令国  张继平
作者单位:1. 红河学院国际合作与交流处,云南红河,661100
2. 华中师范大学高等教育研究所,湖北武汉,430079
摘    要:自主招生制度是大学准入制度的核心之一,在大学人才培养中发挥着重要作用。由于受政治体制、法律传统、社会形态的影响,哈佛大学与复旦大学自主招生制度各有千秋。在招生机制上,哈佛追求学术独立,复旦注重政治功能;在招生标准上,哈佛强调能力,复旦侧重水平;在招生程序上,哈佛崇尚自治,复旦偏重法治;在招生来源上,哈佛取向开放,复旦看重地域;在招生考试上,哈佛主张多元,复旦倾向统一。总体而言,哈佛大学自主招生体现出大学自治的特色,复旦大学自主招生则具有政府主管的倾向。通过对二者的比较,为进一步优化我国高校自主招生制度改革作一些有益的尝试。

关 键 词:自主招生  自主招生制度  哈佛大学  复旦大学

A Comparative Study of the Autonomous Higher Education Admission System Between China and America: in the Case of Harvard University and Fudan University
MENG Ling-guo,ZHANG Ji-ping.A Comparative Study of the Autonomous Higher Education Admission System Between China and America: in the Case of Harvard University and Fudan University[J].Journal of Yangzhou University(Higher Education Study Edition),2011,15(2):21-24,37.
Authors:MENG Ling-guo  ZHANG Ji-ping
Institution:1.International Relations Office,Honghe University,Honghe 661100,Yunnan,China;2.Institute of Higher Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,Hubei,China)
Abstract:One of the core principles in university admission system is the autonomy of universities in enrolling students.With their different political systems,legal traditions and social systems,Harvard University and Fudan University have different admission systems in terms of the operating mechanism,criteria for admission,enrolling procedures,regional orientation,and entrance examination.A comprehensive comparison shows that Harvard University represents university autonomy while Fudan University manifests government-administering nature in their respective autonomous admission systems.
Keywords:autonomous admission  autonomous admission system  Harvard University  Fudan University
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号