| 法律论证:概念架构与语义分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄竹胜.法律论证:概念架构与语义分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,39(2):27-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄竹胜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西师范大学,法商学院,广西,桂林,541001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律论证是法律交涉活动的主体在法律交互活动中运用法律理由并通过一定的证明方式对论证客体的合法性、合理性证明。法律解释为法律论证提供前提性条件，法律推理则与法律论证构成目的与手段的关系。法律论证作为一种实践理性活动，具有目的性、合理性、实践性、形式化和限制性等活动特征。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律论证 法律推理 法律解释 概念架构 语义分析 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-6597(2003)02-0027-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年1月8日 |
LEGAL PROOF:CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS |
| |
| HUANG Zhu,sheng.LEGAL PROOF:CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS[J].Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosphy and Social Science Edition),2003,39(2):27-32. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Zhu sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | Legal proof is the main subject in the course of legal representation, which is a kind of proof with legal and rational validity employed in legal activities by way of reasoning and supply of evidence. Legal interpretation prepares conditions or prerequisites for legal proof. Legal analogy and legal proof form the relationship between purpose and means. Legal proof, as an activity to practice reason, is characterized by its teleonomy, rationality, practicality, formalization and restriction. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal proof legal analogy legal interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
