Attributional (explanatory) thinking about failure in new achievement settings |
| |
Authors: | Raymond P Perry Robert H Stupnisky Lia M Daniels Tara L Haynes |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P433 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road, R3T 2N2, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 2. Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P301 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road, R3T 2N2, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 3. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, 6-102 Education North, T6G 2G5, Edmonton, AB, Canada 4. Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P404 Duff Roblin Building, 190 Dysart Road, R3T 2N2, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
|
| |
Abstract: | Attributional (explanatory) thinking involves the appraisal of factors that contribute to performance and is instrumental
to motivation and goal striving. Little is understood, however, concerning attributional thinking when multiple causes are
involved in the transition to new achievement settings. Our study examined such complex attributional thinking in the transition
from high school to university, a shift from familiar to novel learning environments, in the context of Weiner’s attribution
theory (1972, 1985, 1995, 2006). At the start of the academic year, students rated the extent to which each of six common
attributions contributed to poor performance to ascertain their relative importance to each other. A fixed order of attributions
was reported as contributing to poor performance that was identical across five independent cohorts of first-year students
(effort, test difficulty, strategy, professor quality, ability, luck, respectively). Cluster analysis revealed that students
differed in combining these attributions into clusters suggesting diminished or enhanced control over poor performance. These
differences in attribution clusters were associated with cognitive and affective outcomes at the start of Term 1, and with
course grades and GPA at the end of Term 2. Student differences in complex attributional thinking are discussed in terms of
transitions to new achievement settings. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|