The Effects of Dimensionality on Equating the Law School Admission Test |
| |
| Authors: | Gregory Camilli Ming-mei Wang Jacqueline Fesq |
| |
| Institution: | Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey;Educational Testing Service;Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey |
| |
| Abstract: | Using factor analysis, we conducted an assessment of multidimensionality for 6 forms of the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) and found 2 subgroups of items or factors for each of the 6 forms. The main conclusion of the factor analysis component of this study was that the LSAT appears to measure 2 different reasoning abilities: inductive and deductive. The technique of N. J. Dorans & N. M. Kingston (1985) was used to examine the effect of dimensionality on equating. We began by calibrating (with item response theory IRT] methods) all items on a form to obtain Set I of estimated IRT item parameters. Next, the test was divided into 2 homogeneous subgroups of items, each having been determined to represent a different ability (i.e., inductive or deductive reasoning). The items within these subgroups were then recalibrated separately to obtain item parameter estimates, and then combined into Set II. The estimated item parameters and true-score equating tables for Sets I and II corresponded closely. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
