|
|||||
|
|
浅议我国反垄断法规制方法的选择 |
|
| 引用本文： | 胡佳. 浅议我国反垄断法规制方法的选择 [J].哈尔滨学院学报,2007,28(3):47-51. |
| 作者姓名： | 胡佳 |
| 作者单位： | 华中师范大学,政法学院,湖北,武汉,430079 |
| 摘 要： | 目前,世界上各国反垄断法主要有两种规制方法:结构主义的规制方法与行为主义的规制方法,行为主义规制方法已经成为各国反垄断法的立法和司法实践的主流和发展趋势。文章从美日等国反垄断法规制方法的变化潮流,结合我国的实际发展情况,提出了我国反垄断法规制方法的选择:一方面,可采结构主义规制方法侧重于打破行政垄断;另一方面,可采行为主义规制方法用于打破市场垄断。 |
| 关 键 词： | 反垄断法 规制方法 行为主义 结构主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-5856（2007）03-0047-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-05-22 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年5月22日 |
The Choice of Regulating Model of China's Anti-dumping Laws |
|
| HU Jia.The Choice of Regulating Model of China''''s Anti-dumping Laws[J].Journal of Harbin University,2007,28(3):47-51. | |
| Authors: | HU Jia |
| Abstract: | There are two regulating models of the laws of anti-monopoly,say structuralism and behaviorism,and monopoly regulating model of behaviorism has been the mainstream and development scenario of legislation and judicial practice of the law of anti-monopoly in many countries.According to the trends of regulating models in legislating anti-monopoly in Japan and the United States and the development of China,a conclusion of the regulating models of China may draws that choosing structuralism to break administrative monopoly,and also choosing behaviorism to control marketing monopoly. |
| Keywords: | anti-monopoly laws regulating model behaviorism structuralism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《哈尔滨学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 | |