Laptop versus longhand note taking: effects on lecture notes and achievement |
| |
| Authors: | Linlin Luo Kenneth A Kiewra Abraham E Flanigan Markeya S Peteranetz |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Department of School Research, School Development, and Evaluation,University of Regensburg,Regensburg,Germany;2.Department of Educational Psychology,University of Nebraska-Lincoln,Lincoln,USA;3.School of Communication Studies,Ohio University,Athens,USA |
| |
| Abstract: | There has been a shift in college classrooms from students recording lecture notes using a longhand pencil-paper medium to using laptops. The present study investigated whether note-taking medium (laptop, longhand) influenced note taking and achievement when notes were recorded but not reviewed (note taking’s process function) and when notes were recorded and reviewed (note taking’s product function). One unique aspect of the study was determining how laptop and longhand note taking influence the recording of lecture images in notes and image-related achievement. Note-taking results showed that laptop note takers recorded more notes (idea units and words) and more verbatim lecture strings than did longhand note takers who, in turn, recorded more visual notes (signals and images) than did laptop note takers. Achievement results showed that when taking laptop notes, the process function of note taking was more beneficial than the product function of note taking (i.e., better image-related learning and similar text-related learning). When taking longhand notes, the product function of note taking was more beneficial than the process function of note taking (i.e., better text-related learning and similar image-related learning). Achievement findings suggest that the optimal note-taking medium depends on the nature of the lecture and whether notes are reviewed. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
