首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

高校"中国近现代史纲要"课教学的几个问题
引用本文:朱志敏.高校"中国近现代史纲要"课教学的几个问题[J].教学与研究,2007(5):61-66.
作者姓名:朱志敏
作者单位:北京师范大学,政治学与国际关系学院,北京,100875
摘    要:以"讲历史逻辑"为大学历史教育的理念,既可以区别高校"中国近现代史纲要"课与中学"中国近现代史"课程,为做好二者的衔接确定依据,也可以使之避免与"讲理论逻辑"的"毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和'三个代表'重要思想概论"课重复.以历史细节论证历史逻辑,是增进该课程教学实效的较好方式.

关 键 词:中国近现代史纲要  衔接  区别  效果  高校  中国  近现代史  史纲  教学实效  问题  Teaching  Methods  Issues  History  Modern  Chinese  历史细节  概论  毛泽东思想  三个代表  邓小平理论  理论逻辑  确定依据  课程  中学
文章编号:0257-2826(2007)05-0061-06
修稿时间:2007年2月27日

Issues on the Teaching Methods of "A Survey of the Chinese Modern and Contemporary History"
ZHU Zhi-min.Issues on the Teaching Methods of "A Survey of the Chinese Modern and Contemporary History"[J].Teaching and Research,2007(5):61-66.
Authors:ZHU Zhi-min
Abstract:The principle of teaching the historical logic is a distinctive feature of university history class,which is a criterion to distinguish the university course "A Survey of Chinese Modern and Contemporary History" from the middle school course "History of Modern and Contemporary Chinese History".This principle also serves for two other purposes.One is to function as a link between these two courses,the other is to avoid repeating some of the contents in the course "A Survey of Important Theories of Mao Zedong Thought,Deng Xiaoping Theory,and Three Represents",since the latter emphasizes on "teaching the theoretical logic".The author concludes that explaining the historical logic by historical facts is an effective way to improve the quality of the course.
Keywords:A Survey of Chinese Modern and Contem porary History  link  distinction  effect
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号