| 中美欧内部数字治理格局比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李昊林,王娟,谢子龙,王卓明,宋洁.中美欧内部数字治理格局比较研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(10):1376-1385. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李昊林 王娟 谢子龙 王卓明 宋洁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学 法学院 北京 100871;北京大学 大数据分析与应用技术国家工程实验室 北京 100871;北京大学 社会学系 北京 100871;北京大学 大数据分析与应用技术国家工程实验室 北京 100871;北京大学 工学院工业工程与管理系 北京 100871 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国科学院学部咨询评议项目（2021-ZW07-B-014） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 考察各国内部的数字治理格局，在认清现状的基础上，厘清其各自的内在生成逻辑，对于中国更好参与国际数字化发展而言至关重要。文章利用数字生态视角对中国、美国、欧盟（以下简称“中美欧”）内部数字治理格局进行了比较研究，试图阐明中美欧各自的数字生态发展模式，并分析发展模式与其数字规制体系之间的关系。研究发现，美国形成全要素领先的发展模式及以鼓励创新为核心的规制体系；欧盟国家多元的发展模式影响欧盟层面形成了以市场建构为核心的规制体系；中国的发展模式表现出应用驱动的特征，规制体系以发展与安全为双核心。文章据此对中国如何优化调整自身数字规制体系，转型升级自身数字生态发展模式提出建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 数字治理 格局 数字生态 规制体系 发展模式 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022/9/26 0:00:00 |
Comparative Study on Internal Digital Governance Patterns of China, United States, and European Union |
| |
| LI Haolin,WANG Juan,XIE Zilong,WANG Zhuoming,SONG Jie.Comparative Study on Internal Digital Governance Patterns of China, United States, and European Union[J].Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2022,37(10):1376-1385. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Haolin WANG Juan XIE Zilong WANG Zhuoming SONG Jie |
| |
| Institution: | Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;National Engineering Laboratory of Big Data Analysis and Applications, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;Department of Sociology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; National Engineering Laboratory of Big Data Analysis and Applications, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to better participate in the international digital development, it is crucial to investigate the internal digital governance pattern of various countries and clarify their internal generation logic on the basis of recognizing the current situation. This work makes a comparative study of the internal digital governance patterns in China, the United States and European Union from the perspective of digital ecology, attempts to clarify their respective digital ecological development models, and analyzes the relationship between the development models and their digital regulation systems. The study found that the United States has formed a development model taking the lead in all aspects and a regulation system centered on encouraging innovation. The diversified development model of EU member countries has affected the EU to form a regulation system centered on market construction. China''s development model shows the characteristics of being applicationdriven, and the regulation system takes development and security as the dual core. Based on this, the study puts forward suggestions on how to optimize and adjust China''s digital regulation system, as well as transform and upgrade its digital ecological development model. |
| |
| Keywords: | digital governance pattern digital ecology regulation system development model |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院院刊》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院院刊》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
