| 再评艾略特与哲学 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 矫威,程爽.再评艾略特与哲学[J].黑龙江教育学院学报,2005,24(3):8-9. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 矫威 程爽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 哈尔滨师范大学,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150080
2. 南京大学,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《剑桥文学指南》中的《特·斯·艾略特》对T·S·艾略特与哲学的关系进行了深入研究,对这一研究进行的后设研究具有开创性与深化作用。对于艾略特哲学思想的转变及其原因追本溯源,突出不同哲学流派、不同时段的哲学思想对他的影响及其之间的内在矛盾变化。多元主义解释学,对实证科学的批评也是现代哲学的动向或走势,所以艾略特和现代哲人的生活得以实现。但这种研究仍存在不足,如某些文学和哲学概念间的分歧、哲学与文学间的学科交叉产生种种矛盾,等等。
|
| 关 键 词： | 艾略特 哲学 后设评论 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-7836(2005)03-0008-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年12月21 |
Matacriticism on T·S· Eliot and Philosophy |
| |
| JIAO Wei,Cheng Shuang.Matacriticism on T·S· Eliot and Philosophy[J].Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education,2005,24(3):8-9. |
| |
| Authors: | JIAO Wei Cheng Shuang |
| |
| Abstract: | The article is a matacriticism of the relationship between T·S·Eliot and philosophy as studied in The Cambridge Companion to T·S·Eliot.It traces the change of Eliot' s philosophical ideas and its reasons, emphasizing the influence of different philosophical schools of different periods of time upon him, the internal contradiction and the compromise. Based on a close study of the article, the author analyses the value of such study and points out the demerits of the article, such as the ambiguity of some definitions and the contradiction between philosophy and literature. |
| |
| Keywords: | T````````````````S``````````````````Eliot philosophy matacriticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
