| 唐初佛道义理之辩论析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 成守勇.唐初佛道义理之辩论析[J].淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,26(3):324-328. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 成守勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 淮阴师范学院,政治系,江苏,淮安,223001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 唐初佛道争辩中,论题主要围绕着道与自然,道与万物,道可否言说等方面展开,佛教攻击道教的策略:一是以日常经验思维去否证道教的终极信仰———"道"———的至上性;再则是指出道教自身对"道"理解不具有一致性,存在着矛盾。从记载来看,道教学者的辩白是无力的,他们对佛教问难的较合理的解答更多体现在他们的著作中。这些著作既是道教学者的应难之作,也展现了道教发展的历史轨迹。
|
| 关 键 词： | 佛教 道教 道 辩难 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8444(2004)03-0324-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月20 |
The Debate between the Buddhist and the Taoist in Early Tang Dynasty |
| |
| CHENG Shou-yong.The Debate between the Buddhist and the Taoist in Early Tang Dynasty[J].Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition),2004,26(3):324-328. |
| |
| Authors: | CHENG Shou-yong |
| |
| Abstract: | During the debate between the Buddhist and the Taoist in early Tang Dynasty, the issues concerned mainly by the two sides as follows: the relation between Tao and Nature, the relation between Tao and the World, and Tao whether or not to be talked. One of the strategies used by the Buddhist again the Taoist is to deny the supreme belief of Tao by daily experienced thinking; and the other is to point out many contradictions existing in Taoist's understanding to "Tao". According to the records, though the apology of the Taoist is weak in debate but the reasonable explanation embodied in their works, which not only showed the track of development of Daoism history but also responded the queries of Buddhist. |
| |
| Keywords: | Buddhism Taoism Tao debate |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
