| 威胁、引诱、欺骗审讯方法的理论思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵津武.威胁、引诱、欺骗审讯方法的理论思考[J].山东商业职业技术学院学报,2014(4):94-97. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵津武 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学法学院,山东济南250100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改虽保留了原刑诉法有关威胁、引诱、欺骗为非法方法的规定,但立法过程中的争论、冲突显示出立法机关以及理论界对于威胁、引诱、欺骗的审讯方法的合法性存在着不同看法。威胁、引诱、欺骗的审讯方法在刑事司法实践中是有一定存在的空间的,理清威胁、引诱、欺骗的取证方法与非法取证方法之间的界线,有利于解决我国法律规定之间以及法律规定与司法实践相脱节的矛盾。
|
| 关 键 词： | 威胁 引诱 欺骗 合法性 限制 |
Theoretical Reflection of Threating,Tempting and Cheating Interrogational Methods |
| |
| Institution: | ZHAO Jin - wu ( Law School of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | In 2012,the criminal procedure law revision although retained the original points about the threating,tempting and cheating rules are illegal evidence collecting methods. However,the controversy and confliction in the process of legislation showed that the legislature and the theoretical circle have different points of threating,tempting and cheating. The evidence collecting methods of threating,tempting and cheating have their existing space in the judicial practice. To solve the contradiction between legislation and judicial practice,first of all,we must clarify the boundary line between threating,tempting,cheating methods and illegal evidence collecting method. |
| |
| Keywords: | threating tempting cheating legitimacy limitation |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
