首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

机械课程设计质量模糊评价方法研究
引用本文:陈光柱,许娟,闫海峰,程志红,赵子江.机械课程设计质量模糊评价方法研究[J].煤炭高等教育,2006,24(2):104-106.
作者姓名:陈光柱  许娟  闫海峰  程志红  赵子江
作者单位:中国矿业大学,机电工程学院,江苏,徐州,221008
基金项目:中国矿业大学科技基金项目,项目编号:E200412
摘    要:针对机械课程设计质量评价的模糊性,采用模糊综合评判模型,在专家知识和主观经验的基础上,利用具有严密逻辑性的数学方法尽可能地删除主观成分,合理确定评价指标权重和评价指标体系,给出具体的评价方法和实例。该评价方法解决了传统的机械课程设计的质量评价方法中不能量化、人为因素影响大以及主观随意性强等缺点,评价过程科学、合理、定量化,评价结果客观、公正。

关 键 词:课程设计  质量  模糊综合评判
文章编号:1004-8154(2006)02-0104-03
收稿时间:2005-12-30
修稿时间:2005-12-30

On Quality Evaluation Method for Mechanical Course Design with Fuzzy Theory
CHEN Guang-zhu,XU Juan,YAN Hai-feng,CHENG Zhi-hong,ZHAO Zi-jiang.On Quality Evaluation Method for Mechanical Course Design with Fuzzy Theory[J].Meitan Higher Education,2006,24(2):104-106.
Authors:CHEN Guang-zhu  XU Juan  YAN Hai-feng  CHENG Zhi-hong  ZHAO Zi-jiang
Abstract:To make a fuzzy quality evaluation for mechanical course design,the author,based on the professional information and subjective experiences,uses the comprehensive fuzzy assessment model and mathematic method to avoid subjective factors as much as possible.This paper reasonably confirms index weight and index system of evaluation,and supplies specific method and examples of evaluation.The evaluation process turns out to be scientific,reasonable and quantificational,as a result,with objective and candid result,for this method figures out some disadvantages of quality evaluation method,personal influences and subjectivity.
Keywords:course design  quality  comprehensive fuzzy assessment  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号