| 体育纪律处罚的程序公正研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 韩勇.体育纪律处罚的程序公正研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2007,30(12):1614-1616. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 韩勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 首都体育学院,北京,100088 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 北京体育大学博士论文,指导教师:任海教授 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过案例分析对体育纪律处罚的程序公正问题进行研究;指出体育纪律处罚应遵守程序公正以保障当事人权利:被中立的仲裁者听证的权利;法律代理的权利;传唤证人的权利;要求说明理由的权利;被告知权;举证责任在体育组织一方.在听证中,听证者身份应独立,听证者应与案件无利害关系,无职能混和.体育组织在选择仲裁员时注重其法律与体育资格,一些体育组织在涉及运动员的听证中规定要有高水平运动经历的人作为仲裁员,以保证运动员权利.
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育纪律处罚 程序公正 自然正义 体育法 体育组织 纪律处罚 程序公正 公正研究 Discipline Sports 选择仲裁员 运动经历 水平 运动员 资格 法律代理 职能 关系 无利害 案件 身份 举证责任 说明理由 人的权利 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-3612(2007)12-1614-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年7月27日 |
Due Process in Sports Discipline |
| |
| HAN Yong.Due Process in Sports Discipline[J].Journal of Beijing Sport University,2007,30(12):1614-1616. |
| |
| Authors: | HAN Yong |
| |
| Abstract: | This research studied on due process in sports discipline by using case study and argued the proceeding of sports discipline should follow due process to protect sports parties' rights including the right to be heard by no bias arbitrators, the right of legal presentation, the right to summon witnesses, the right to ask explanation, the right to be noticed and the burden of proof should be on sports organization. In the hearings, the arbitrators should be independent and have no interests to the case and no commingling of functions. Both legal and sports qualification are important for arbitrators in hearing and there should be some arbitrators who have the experience of professional sports to protect athlete's right when athlete is one party of the hearing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sports discipline due process natural justice sports law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
