Active learning as destituent potential: Agambenian philosophy of education and moderate steps towards the coming politics |
| |
| Authors: | Michael P A Murphy |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Political Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences Building, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canadammurp078@uOttawa.ca |
| |
| Abstract: | Beginning in earnest in the late 1990s, educational researchers devoted increasing attention to the study of “active learning,” leading to a robust literature on the topic in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Meanwhile, during largely the same period, political theorists discovered the radical philosophy of Giorgio Agamben, which soon after began to ripple through more radical forms of philosophy of education. While both the SoTL works on active learning and writings of “Agambenian” philosophers of education have offered new insights into their respective fields, active learning has not yet received a systematic philosophical reflection and the community of Agambenian philosophy of education has not yet been systematized. This article addresses both gaps, first through an outline of existing Agambenian approaches to the philosophy of education and second by theorizing active learning as a form of “destituent potential.” The systematic reflection on the three threads of Agambenian philosophy of education—whatever, potentiality, and study—offers an introduction to less familiar readers, and the second section offers a model for how philosophical concepts can become theoretical tools for SoTL analysis. |
| |
| Keywords: | Giorgio Agamben continental philosophy destituent potential active learning potentiality |
|
|
