Application specific conversation schemes for ADA programs |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Computer Engineering, Poornima University, Jaipur, India;2. Department of Computer Science, Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner, India;3. Department of Computer Science, Keen College, Bikaner, India;4. Department of Microbiology, Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner, India;1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Schrottova 39, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;2. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, H-6726 Szeged, Közép fasor 52, Hungary;1. Institute for Environmental studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;2. Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic;3. Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food, and Forest systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy;4. Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic |
| |
| Abstract: | The paper considers a development of the conversation scheme version proposed by A. Clematis and V. Gianuzzi in Microprocessing and Microprogramming (Vol. 32, No. 1–5, 1991) 5] and Computer Languages (Vol. 18, No. 3, 1993) 6]. The authors discussed the methodology of using conversations within a conventional concurrent language (Ada), which makes the conversation scheme practical. In our paper we concentrate on the improvements for their scheme. We believe that it is important for the programmer to have more choice, and propose what could be called a library of schemes from which the appropriate scheme could be chosen depending on the application. We discuss ways of setting dynamically the number of processes participating in a conversation; of having different sets of servers involved in different alternates of the same conversation; of introducing a global acceptance test which would be more sophisticated; of increasing robustness of the conversation. All of these proposals are meant to be used within a conventional language. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
