| “明清以来的地方意识与国家认同”学术研讨会述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 于海兵.“明清以来的地方意识与国家认同”学术研讨会述评[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,47(3):163-166. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 于海兵 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东师范大学历史系，上海，２００２４１ |
| |
| 摘 要： | 地方研究已是学界显学，本次研讨会则旨在从国家建构的维度，考察地方意识与国家认同的关系，着力从历史人类学、社会史、政治史、思想史、知识分子研究等方向展开跨领域对话，试图透过迥异的研究路径和研究议题，共同探讨现代中国的国家建构与国家认同之历史过程。与会学者主要探讨了何处是“地方”、谁之“地方”、何种“中国”、何以“中国”等议题。首先，“地方”的意涵和所指是多样化的，不仅指行政区域，也指地理和文化空间，是从乡村、县、省到南方、北方、东北、西北等地域的动态概念。其次，参与并建构地方意识与国家认同的历史主体是多元的，故国家的知识精英和制度文化、地方的宗教专家和社团组织，以及中国边缘和外部世界所想象的“中国”也是多元的。最后，与会学者从地方与国家关系、种族/民族、赋役制度、礼仪宗教、战争、工业资本主义等多重视角，热烈地讨论了多样化“地方”背后的同一性，以及中国何时、如何成为民族国家等问题。这些多元性非但不会妨碍我们理解“中国”，而且是理解的前提和开端。
|
| 关 键 词： | 地方意识 国家认同 国家建构 述评 |
Comments on the Seminar of “Local Consciousness and National Identity since the Ming and Qing Dynasties” |
| |
| YU Hai-bing.Comments on the Seminar of “Local Consciousness and National Identity since the Ming and Qing Dynasties”[J].Journal of East China Normal University :Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2015,47(3):163-166. |
| |
| Authors: | YU Hai-bing |
| |
| Abstract: | Research of locality has become a heated topic in the academic circle. The Seminar of “Local Consciousness and National Identity since the Ming and Qing Dynasties” is aimed to examine the relationship between local consciousness and national identity from the perspective of national construction, carry out cross-field dialogues in terms of historical anthropology, social history, political history, history of ideas, and study on intellectuals, and explore the historical process of national construction and national identity of modern China via different approaches and subjects. Participants in the seminar mainly discusses the issues such as what is “locality”, whose “locality”, what kind of “China”, and what is “China”. Firstly, with varied connotations and denotations, “locality” can mean an administrative region, a geographical or a cultural space. It’s a dynamic notion covering countries, counties, provinces as well as south, north, northeast, and northwest regions. Secondly, the historical subjects who take part in the construction of local consciousness and national identity are diverse, so the imagined “China” varies from the intellectual elite and institutional culture at the national level to the religion experts and social organizations at the local level, and from the border of China to the external world. Finally, scholars heatedly discussed the identity behind the diversity of “locality” and many issues such as when and how China became a nation-state from multi-perspectives of the relationships between locality and nation, race and nationality, tax system, protocol and religions, war and industrial capitalism. The variety will not hinder our understanding of “China”; rather, it is the premise and beginning of our understanding. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
