首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

胥馀其人考论
引用本文:唐迪.胥馀其人考论[J].怀化学院学报,2014(4):83-85.
作者姓名:唐迪
作者单位:贵州大学人文学院,贵州贵阳550025
摘    要:"胥馀"又记作"胥余",在历史典籍中常以植物名与人名出现。对于胥馀其人的讨论集中在《庄子》及各家《庄子注》。从各家《庄子》注疏中可以发现,胥馀被认为是箕子、比干或者伍子胥三者之一。但对于胥馀的身份,学界一直没有定论。本文以《庄子·大宗师》及其注疏中对"胥馀"的记载为中心,结合大量历史文献典籍,从生平、姓名、官职及死因四方面进行考证,由此证明胥馀是箕子而非比干、伍子胥。

关 键 词:《庄子》  胥馀  箕子  比干  伍子胥

The Textual Criticism of Xuyu
TANG Di.The Textual Criticism of Xuyu[J].Journal of Huaihua University,2014(4):83-85.
Authors:TANG Di
Institution:TANG Di ( College of Humanities, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Gulzhou 550025 )
Abstract:“Xuyu” , also known as “Xuyu” ,often appears in plant name and the person's name in the history books .Discussion of Xu can be found in Zhuangzi and the Notes to Zhuangzi .From the the appearance of Zhuangzi , the author holds that Xuyu was identified as one of Jizi ,Bigan and Wuzixu .But for the Xuyu's identity ,the academic circles have not yet drawn final conclusion .Based on the study of a large number of historical literature classics ,his lifetime ,name ,government post and reason of death ,the author concludes that Xuyu is Jizi not Bigan and Wuzixu .
Keywords:Zhuangzi  Xuyu  Jizi  Bigan  Wuzixu
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号