|
|||||
|
|
| 秦岭自然保护区群成本效益研究(III)——综合效益评价 | |
| 引用本文： | 王昌海,温亚利,李宵宇,胡崇德,司开创.秦岭自然保护区群成本效益研究(III)——综合效益评价[J].资源科学,2012,34(11):2154-2163. |
| 作者姓名： | 王昌海 温亚利 李宵宇 胡崇德 司开创 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国林业科学研究院湿地研究所,北京100091 北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京100083 2. 北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京,100083 3. 河北省环境科学研究院,石家庄,050056 4. 太白山国家级自然保护区管理局,眉县,722300 5. 周至国家级自然保护区管理局,周至县,710400 |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金2010-2012项目:“自然保护区管理政策对农户家庭的生产、消费和资源利用方式影响研究”(编号:70803005);国家林业局保护司2009-2011重点立项研究课题:“区域发展对大熊猫自然保护区的影响研究”(编号:621720)。 |
| 摘 要： | 根据秦岭自然保护区群成本效益的计量结果,如何评价秦岭自然保护区群的综合效益是本文研究的关键问题。本文选用了模糊数学隶属函数法,结合秦岭自然保护区群三大效益的计量指标体系及计量结果,进一步筛选出17个主要的综合效益评价指标,同时按照评价指标体系对七大保护区的截面数据进行了估算。研究结果表明,秦岭自然保护区群中周至保护区和太白山的综合效益发展是最好的,佛坪、长青、牛背梁以及朱鹮自然保护区次之,相对综合效益发展最差的是天华山保护区。本研究总结出一套适合森林类型的自然保护区综合效益的评价指标体系与评价方法,可以在缺乏时间序列数据的情况下,利用横向截面数据了解目前自然保护区综合效益发展的情况,并为自然保护区生物多样性的保护提供科学依据。 |
| 关 键 词： | 秦岭自然保护区群 综合效益 评价 |
Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Qinling Mountain Nature Reserve Group: Evaluation of Comprehensive Benefits |
|
| WANG Changhai,WEN Yali,LI Xiaoyu,HU Chongde and SI Kaichuang.Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Qinling Mountain Nature Reserve Group: Evaluation of Comprehensive Benefits[J].Resources Science,2012,34(11):2154-2163. | |
| Authors: | WANG Changhai WEN Yali LI Xiaoyu HU Chongde and SI Kaichuang |
| Institution: | Research Institute of Wetland, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;College of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;College of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;Hebei Provincial Environmental Scientific Research, Shijiazhuang 050056, China;Administrative Bureau of Shaanxi Taibaishan National Nature Reserve, Mei County 722300, China;Administrative Bureau of Shaanxi Zhouzhi National Nature Reserve, Zhouzhi County 710400, China |
| Abstract: | Comprehensive benefit evaluation is the basis for nature reserve resource management and planning, and important in territorial planning. We evaluated nature reserve comprehensive benefits (1) to understand the operation and management of a nature reserve system, especially the harmonious development of the nature reserve with surrounding areas, and (2) provide a basis for the optimization of protection policy. Cost benefit evaluation takes the measurement as the foundation, and considers the whole reserve operation status, and the influence of the cost and benefit on regional development. We used the method of horizontal comparative analysis, involving the transverse comparison of nature reserves within the study area. Through the same time evaluation of the comprehensive benefit between them, we determined the optimal scheme and solved deficiencies in nature reserve development. We selected a fuzzy mathematics method and combined this with a measurement index system and measurement results for three major benefits across the Qinling Mountains nature reserve group. We chose 17 leading comprehensive benefit evaluation indexes and estimated the section data of seven large reserves according to the evaluation index system. We found that that comprehensive benefits of Zhouzhi Nature Reserve and Taibai Nature Reserve were best; the benefits of Foping, Changqing, Niuliangbei and Crested Ibis Nature Reserve were second; and the benefits of Tianhua Mountain Nature Reserve were lowest. This study summarized a suitable comprehensive benefit evaluation index system and evaluation method for forests of different types, which, when lacking time series data, can use section data to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of nature reserves and support nature reserve optimization. |
| Keywords: | Qinling mountain nature reserve group Cost-Benefit Evaluation Reserve optimization Reserve management |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《资源科学》下载免费的PDF全文 | |