首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

债权形式主义下登记效力之检讨——兼论物权法中的司法自由裁量
引用本文:王传国,倪燕秋.债权形式主义下登记效力之检讨——兼论物权法中的司法自由裁量[J].江苏广播电视大学学报,2014(4):92-96.
作者姓名:王传国  倪燕秋
作者单位:东南大学法学院
摘    要:我国《物权法》确立了债权形式主义的物权变动规范模式。这一规定具有强制性,当事人不得通过合意予以规避。在债权形式主义下,不动产登记除了具有转让效力,还具有权利正确性推定效力。基于是否存在第三人,登记推定力可以区隔为证明责任规范和善意取得效力。但是,物权变动模式并不因是否涉及第三人而作不同的处理;否则,债权形式主义与意思主义即失其界限,甚至滑入意思主义的领地。在物权法定原则之下,至少就债权形式主义下的不动产登记而言,不允许当事人以意思自治加以伸缩,司法自由裁量在这一领域亦应保持自制。

关 键 词:物权变动  债权形式主义  登记效力  司法裁量

Review of Registration Effect in Formalism of Creditor---Judicial Free Discretion in Property Law
WANG Chuan-guo,NI Yan-qiu.Review of Registration Effect in Formalism of Creditor---Judicial Free Discretion in Property Law[J].Journal of Jiangsu Radio & Television University,2014(4):92-96.
Authors:WANG Chuan-guo  NI Yan-qiu
Institution:(South East University)
Abstract:Chinese Property Law established the principle of creditor formalism for real right alteration mode .This provision is mandatory and the parties shall not be allowed to avoid it through agreement .By the principle ,the registration of real property can presume the existence of the real right in addition to the potency of transfer .Registration presumption can be separated into the law of the burden of proof and the bona fide acquisition effect according to whether there is the third party .Otherwise,the bounda-ry between the formalism of creditor and the autonomy of creditor will lose ,and even slip into the field of the autonomy of creditor . Under statutory of real right ,at least in terms of the formalism of creditor of the real estate registration ,the parties are not allowed to be flexible and judicial discretion should maintain self-control in this field .
Keywords:change of real right  formalism of creditor  effect of registration  judicial discretion
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号