|
|||||
|
|
| 体育人文社会学实证和思辨研究的差异与整合 | |
| 引用本文： | 胡永红.体育人文社会学实证和思辨研究的差异与整合[J].武汉体育学院学报,2009,43(4):18. |
| 作者姓名： | 胡永红 |
| 作者单位： | 韶关学院体育学院,广东韶关,512005 |
| 摘 要： | 实证和思辨研究是当今体育人文社会学研究经常运用的两种范式,二者存在哲学基础、研究目的、认识事物的程度、选题类型、研究结果的表达方式等方面的差异.同时,二者都存在自身不足.实证范式的不足包括体现不了科学的导向功能、忽视研究中的价值、可能导致以偏概全以及程序和方法僵化等;思辨范式的不足是信度低下、难以创新.体育人文社会学实证和思辨研究范式之间存在整合的可行性,实地研究为二者的整合提供了途径. |
| 关 键 词： | 体育人文社会学 范式 实证 思辨 整合 研究方法 |
Differences and integration of sports humanities and sociology positivism and speculative researches |
|
| HU Yong-hong.Differences and integration of sports humanities and sociology positivism and speculative researches[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education,2009,43(4):18. | |
| Authors: | HU Yong-hong |
| Abstract: | Positivism and speculative researches are two paradigms widely used in sport s humanities and sociology researches. They are different in p hilosop hical bases , research p urposes , realization of t hings , research topics and demonst ration of research result s etc. Bot h have their weaknesses. Posi2 tivism cannot be scientific guidance wit h ignorance of values in researches , which can lead to preju2 dice , rigid procedure and met hods. While speculative researches are hard to be innovative and be val2 id. In t his paper , ways of integrating t he two paradigms are proposed |
| Keywords: | sport s humanities and sociology paradigm positivism speculation integration research met hod |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 | |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 | |