| 儒家人伦之“道”、道家自然之“道”与中国古代文论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘占祥.儒家人伦之“道”、道家自然之“道”与中国古代文论[J].内蒙古大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,41(2):111-116. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘占祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川,成都,610064
|
| |
| 摘 要： | 道，是中国先秦一个极其重要的范畴，蕴含着古人丰富的思想，并成为中国古代文论的逻辑起点。道的原始意义是“道路”，在老子、孔子的时代被引申、转型为“道理”之类的意义。但老子道家之“道”和孔子儒家之“道”有着明显的差别，相对而言，前者更侧重于“自然”之道；后者更侧重于“人伦”之道。两种不同内涵的“道”，在中国古代文论中都有明显的反映。
|
| 关 键 词： | 道 自然之道：人伦之道 |
"Tao" of Confucian's Human Relationships and"Tao" of Taoistic Nature |
| |
| LIU Zhan-xiang."Tao" of Confucian's Human Relationships and"Tao" of Taoistic Nature[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Humanities & Social Sciences),2009,41(2):111-116. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Zhan-xiang |
| |
| Institution: | School of Literature and Journalism;Sichuan University;Chengdu 610064;China |
| |
| Abstract: | As an extremely important category in the Pre-Qin Period,Tao containing luxuriant thought of the ancient becomes the logical starting point of Chinese ancient literature theory.Tao's primitive significance is "Road",but it was expanded and transformed into "principle" and the similar significance in the times of Lao Zi and Kong Zi.There are obvious differences between Lao Zi' "Tao" and Kong Zi' "Tao".The former stresses on "nature",and the latter stresses on "human ethic".From the two quite different "Tao"s... |
| |
| Keywords: | Tao Nature's Tao The standards of human relationships |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
