| 理性与情感:亚里士多德与孟子伦理思想的差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴先伍.理性与情感:亚里士多德与孟子伦理思想的差异[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,33(1):36-41. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴先伍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽师范大学,政法学院,安徽,芜湖,241000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 安徽省高等学校青年教师科研资助项目(2004jqw33) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 亚里士多德与孟子作为轴心时代的思想家,二者之间的差异实际上预示着中西伦理思想后来发展的不同路向。亚里士多德以理性作为至善追求的核心概念,理性不但构成了亚里士多德追求至善的逻辑起点和最终的检验标准,并将至善本身看成理性的自我展开,而情感作为低级的情欲被排除在至善追求之外。孟子以人类天生的爱亲敬长的道德情感为核心,展开了一个情感伦理系统,使道德的培养变成了一个自然而然的过程。
|
| 关 键 词： | 亚里士多德 孟子 理性 情感 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2435(2005)01-0036-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年5月8日 |
Reason and emotion: Different orientations of ethics of Aristotle and Mencius |
| |
| WU Xian-wu.Reason and emotion: Different orientations of ethics of Aristotle and Mencius[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2005,33(1):36-41. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Xian-wu |
| |
| Abstract: | Both as the ideologists of Axes-Times, the difference between Aristotle and Mencius indicated the different ways of the western and Chinese ethic. Reason was the core of Aristotle's ethic. In Aristotle's thought, it was the logical starting point and criterion of summum bonum, which was regarded by him as the self-expansion of reason. Emotion was eliminated from summun bonum. Mencius' thought was just contrary to Aristotle. He constructed an ethical system centered on man's innate ethical emotions of love for brothers and reverence for the elder. He made ethical cultivating become a natural process beyond the western power. |
| |
| Keywords: | Aristotle Mencius reason emotion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
