| 儒士之辩与策士之辩--试比较《孟子》与《战国策》的辩辞 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘良俊.儒士之辩与策士之辩--试比较《孟子》与《战国策》的辩辞[J].湖北广播电视大学学报,2006,23(3):51-53. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘良俊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北大学,知行学院洪山校区,湖北,武汉,430074 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文试图通过对《孟子》与《战国策》作比较分析,说明儒家和纵横家辩辞的差别,着重展现两家在道义与权术问题上的争锋,以及温敦醇厚与辩丽多姿的殊异。进而说明导致两家较量胜负殊异是儒士与策士们所持政见不同所致。
|
| 关 键 词： | 儒士 道义 醇厚 策士 权术 辩丽 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7424（2006）03-0051-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 01 20 2006 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-01-20 |
Debate with the plotter one in the debating of Confucian scholar--compare between the excuse of "Mencius" and "the Warring States scheme" |
| |
| LIU Liang-jun.Debate with the plotter one in the debating of Confucian scholar--compare between the excuse of "Mencius" and "the Warring States scheme"[J].Journal of Hubei Radio& Televisonuniversity,2006,23(3):51-53. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Liang-jun |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Liang-jun |
| |
| Abstract: | Though the compare and analysis with "the Warring States scheme" to "Mencius", this paper explained the difference of excuse between Confucianists and Political Strategists. Fighting for mastery on morality and justice and political trickery of two are represented emphatically, and the warm and mellow and the beautiful and colorful debating are analyzed. Then it is made out that the causes the win and defeat of trial of strength of two families are resulted from their different political views. |
| |
| Keywords: | Confucian scholar Morality and justice Mellow Political Strategists Political trickery Debate beautifully |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
