Student evaluations of teaching: perceptions of faculty based on gender,position, and rank |
| |
| Authors: | Lori R Kogan Regina Schoenfeld-Tacher Peter W Hellyer |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Clinical Sciences , Colorado State University , Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA lori.kogan@colostate.edu;3. Department of Clinical Sciences , Colorado State University , Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The current study explores the feelings and thoughts that faculty have about their student evaluations of teaching (SET). To assess the perceptions of SETs, all teaching faculty in one college at a western Land Grant University were asked to complete an anonymous online survey. The survey included demographic questions (i.e. gender; rank such as assistant, associate, and full professor; and positions like non-tenure track, tenure track, and tenured) as well as questions related to faculty's feelings while reading their SETs. While minimal differences were found in responses based on rank or position, several differences were found based on faculty gender. Overall, female faculty appear to be more negatively impacted by student evaluations than male faculty. These gender differences support previous research that suggests males and females receive and react differently to personal evaluation. Resultant suggestions include modifying surveys from anonymous to confidential and offering professional development training for faculty. |
| |
| Keywords: | student teaching evaluations gender assessment faculty |
|
|
